nx_peer_review.nx

nx_peer_review.nx -- who watches the watchers. The evaluators must themselves be checked, or the honest-S-class verdict is just one organ's opinion (operator). Three mechanisms: DUAL GRADE -- the Examiner AND Claude grade the same thing; AGREE = trustworthy, DIVERGE = a tie-break flag (Claude or the operator breaks it). Divergences map the Examiner's growth: a divergence usually means the Examiner LACKED a SOTA baseline (the RESEARCHER's job to supply) or the EVIDENCE/citations (the LIBRARIAN's job) -- so the Examiner is built up IN CONJUNCTION with the Researcher + Librarian. MUTUAL JUDGE -- the CRITIC judges the Examiner's grading (is it triangulated + red-teamed + counter-free = sound?), and the Examiner grades the Critic (does it clear the teammate bar?). Checks & balances on the judges themselves. TIE-BREAK -- when two graders disagree, a human/Critic verdict resolves it; agreement stands. license_tier: ORIGINAL Refs: separation of powers; peer review.