code wiki / _hdl_build / _ttt_diag.nx

_ttt_diag.nx

buildroot/runtime/_hdl_build/_ttt_diag.nx

1687 B34 linesdepth 4pulls 4 transitivereach 0 importersview sourcekind tool
docsdependenciesstructsconstsfunctions

about

_ttt_diag.nx -- diagnostic twin of nx_tictactoe_test assertion 8: play the 9-move draw sequence, then PRINT each cell, the per-move try_apply results, and the final outcome. Run under bash vs under the NishiLang exec probe to see exactly where the two execution contexts diverge (2026-06-09).

dependencies 3 imports · 0 importers

nx_syscalls.nx nx_tier.nx nx_tictactoe.nx _ttt_diag.nx

imports: nx_syscalls.nxnx_tier.nxnx_tictactoe.nx

imported by: nobody (leaf or entry point)

call flow from main pre-order; caps 40 nodes / depth 6 declared; ↻ = already shown

main nx_ttt_new sys_mmap td_puts sys_write td_putn sys_mmap ↻ sys_write ↻ sys_mmap ↻ nx_ttt_try_apply nx_ttt_is_legal nx_ttt_other nx_ttt_evaluate nx_ttt_outcome

structs

none

consts

none

functions

9func td_puts(s: *u8) -> i64 { var n: i64 = 0; while s[n] != (0 as u8) { n = n + 1 } sys_write(1, s, n); return 0 }
called by 1: main calls 1: sys_write
10func td_putn(v: i64) -> i64 { let bb: *u8 = sys_mmap(28); var m: i64=v; if m<0 {m=0-m;sys_write(1,"-" as *u8,1)}; let t: *u8 = sys_mmap(28); var k: i64=0; if m==0 {t[0]=48;k=1}; while m>0 {t[k]=48+(m%10); m=m/10; k=k+1}; var i: i64=0; while i<k {bb[i]=t[k-1-i]; i=i+1}; sys_write(1, bb, k); return 0 }
called by 1: main calls 2: sys_mmapsys_write
12func main() -> nx_int