nx_game_redteam_gate.nx

nx_game_redteam_gate.nx -- ADVERSARIAL audit of MY OWN critics. A critic I calibrated to pass my own "rich" frame and fail my own "toy" frame proves nothing; it is circular. Rigor = try to FOOL it. Two attacks a real instrument MUST resist: ATTACK 1 (visual): pure RANDOM NOISE. It has maximal palette + edge density + coverage. If nx_game_critic scores it RICH/SOTA, the critic rewards BUSYNESS, not coherent art -- my "RICH 684" game claim is then weak (measures pixel churn, not quality). ATTACK 2 (depth): a COIN-FLIP outcome table (random win/loss, ZERO skill). It has spread + a loss + variance. If nx_game_depth scores it DEEP, my critic conflates "has a lose state + variance" with "skill matters" -- my "DEEP 1000" claim is then weak (a no-skill game scores DEEP). This gate PASSES only if the critics RESIST both attacks (noise->TOY, coin-flip->SHALLOW). A RED here is an honest finding about MY tools, reported as such -- not swept under a green rug. license_tier: ORIGINAL expect_exit: 0