nx_microscan_lib.nx

nx_microscan_lib.nx -- INVERSE MICRO-SURFACE ANALYSIS: infer a surface's micro-STRUCTURE, and its DEFECTS, from the field itself. The estate already GENERATES micro-relief (nx_relief_lib owns the forward law: three bands and a jittered-grid pore layer). Nothing ever read a field back. This is that half, and it is deliberately the INVERSE of a generator rather than a second generator. WHY THIS IS A LEAF THAT KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT SKIN. Every function below takes a plain field of i64 samples, a width, a height and the physical size of one sample. It has no pore constant, no skin constant and no relief import -- so the same analyser reads a skin height map, a machined surface, or a field of WALL THICKNESSES off a mesh, and the teapot-leak question is the same call as the pore question with a different quantity in the array. A ruler that imported the thing it measures could not be pointed anywhere else, and its round-trip test would be circular. THE FOUR QUESTIONS IT ANSWERS, all as NUMBERS and never as a diagnosis: 1. WHAT IS THE PERIOD of the discrete features carried here? ms_period_texels / ms_period_um 2. IS THIS A LATTICE AT ALL, or a random scatter? ms_regularity_permil 3. ARE TWO LAYERS BOUND OR INDEPENDENT? ms_hit_permil / ms_reg_verdict 4. WHERE DOES THIS FIELD DEPART FROM ITSELF? ms_robust / ms_anom_count / ms_min_loc DECLARED SCOPE, because this is the half that is usually overclaimed: question 4 emits CANDIDATE REGIONS WITH SCORES. It is an outlier finder over a field. It is NOT a diagnosis of anything and no clinical reading may be built on it -- the resolution bar is stated in the gate's verdict note. license_tier: ORIGINAL No hw writes (Rule 26).