code wiki / _hdl_build / nx_quality_raci_test.nx
nx_quality_raci_test.nx
buildroot/runtime/_hdl_build/nx_quality_raci_test.nx
about
nx_quality_raci_test.nx -- proves the feature is ROBUST and correctly DISTRIBUTED across organs:
ENGINEER diagnoses the bound, BUILDER decides the operating point under the COUNCIL's quality
policy. Exit 0 only if every check holds.
(1) decode matvec (Q4) -> Engineer: MEMORY-bound, lever=DATA.
(2) Builder, balancing quality(slightly>speed) under the Council floor, picks Q4_K_M -- which
the published data independently calls the best quality/size balance. NOT the fastest.
(3) contrast: a pure-SPEED choice would pick Q2_K (smallest, +8.82% perplexity) -> proves the
balance is doing real work, and quality is being protected.
(4) compute-bound kernel -> Builder keeps HIGHEST quality (bytes don't bind; no quality sacrifice).
(5) COUNCIL floor rejects Q2_K/Q3_K_M, admits Q4_K_M.
(6) ROBUSTNESS: invalid input (0 bytes) -> RF_UNKNOWN (no silent verdict); a 4-exabyte kernel
(overflow range) still returns a valid bound; all-below-floor -> graceful highest-quality.
license_tier: ORIGINAL
dependencies 2 imports · 0 importers
imports: nx_builder_quant.nxnx_syscalls.nx
imported by: nobody (leaf or entry point)
call flow from main pre-order; caps 40 nodes / depth 6 declared; ↻ = already shown
structs
| none |
consts
| none |
functions
| 18 | func qt_puts(s: *u8) -> i64 { var n: i64 = 0; while s[n] != (0 as u8) { n = n + 1 } sys_write(1, s, n); return 0 } |
| 19 | func qt_num(v: i64) -> i64 { let bb: *u8 = sys_mmap(28); var m: i64=v; if m<0 {m=0-m}; let t: *u8 = sys_mmap(28); var k: i64=0; if m==0 {t[0]=48;k=1}; while m>0 {t[k]=48+(m%10); m=m/10; k=k+1}; var i: i64=0; while i<k {bb[i]=t[k-1-i]; i=i+1}; sys_write(1, bb, k); return 0 } |
| 21 | func main() -> i64 |