nx_stability_rh_test.nx
buildroot/runtime/nx_stability_rh_test.nx
about
nx_stability_rh_test.nx -- gate for the moisture axis and the separation.
THE LIAR-KILL IS THE ROUND TRIP (T3/T4): pick a true activation energy and
a true moisture sensitivity, GENERATE three lifetimes from them, then hand
only those lifetimes to the solver and see whether it recovers the two
numbers it was never told. A solver that could not actually separate the
axes would come back with something else, or with a pair that merely
reproduces the data it was fitted to.
THE SECOND CLAIM IS THE REFUSAL (T5/T6): ICH's own design has two
conditions, which is one contrast, which cannot resolve two axes. The
solver must REFUSE that rather than emit a confident number -- and it must
refuse for the structural reason (a singular system), not because someone
typed a special case for it.
expect_exit: 0 license_tier: ORIGINAL
dependencies 4 imports · 0 importers
imports: nx_syscalls.nxnx_pow10.nxnx_stability.nxnx_stability_rh.nx
imported by: nobody (leaf or entry point)
call flow from main pre-order; caps 40 nodes / depth 6 declared; ↻ = already shown
structs
| none |
consts
| 29 | const TRUE_E10: i64 = 2340000 // milli-Kelvin -> about 44.8 kJ/mol |
| 30 | const TRUE_B10: i64 = 15 // milli-decades per %RH |
functions
| 22 | func t_puts(s: *u8) -> i64 { var n: i64 = 0; while s[n] != (0 as u8) { n = n + 1 } sys_write(1, s, n); return 0 } |
| 23 | func t_putn(v: i64) -> i64 { let bb: *u8 = sys_mmap(28); var m: i64 = v; if m < 0 { m = 0 - m; sys_write(1, "-" as *u8, 1) } let t: *u8 = sys_mmap(28); var k: i64 = 0; if m == 0 { t[0] = 48 as u8; k = 1 } while m > 0 { t[k] = (48 + (m % 10)) as u8; m = m / 10; k = k + 1 } var i: i64 = 0; while i < k { bb[i] = t[k - 1 - i]; i = i + 1 } sys_write(1, bb, k); return 0 } |
| 24 | func iabs(v: i64) -> i64 { if v < 0 { return 0 - v } return v } called by 1: main |
| 32 | func main() -> i64 |